SSH IDREC and DREC application process

The University requires the ethics review of research involving human participants or personal data, as set out in its Research Ethics Policy.

Applicants based in the Social Sciences Division or Humanities Division should submit their ethics application to their departmental research ethics committee (DREC) or to the Social Sciences and Humanities Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee (SSH IDREC) if their department does not have its own DREC.

Applicants from colleges or administrative departments are also welcome to submit ethics applications to the SSH IDREC.

NB: From Tuesday 3rd September 2024, all staff and students within the Humanities and Social Sciences Divisions will be able to submit ethics applications via the Worktribe Ethics system. For the first five weeks, it will still be possible to submit applications using the current Microsoft Word application forms. From Thursday 10th October 2024 all ethics applications must be submitted via Worktribe. Microsoft Word application forms submitted after midnight on Wednesday 9th October 2024 will not be accepted.

Application forms and process

Expand All

 

An electronic ethics application system, Worktribe Ethics, is being introduced across the University during July - December 2024. Refer to the Worktribe Ethics webpage to check when your department is going to start using Worktribe for the submission of ethics applications. If your department is not yet using Worktribe please submit a Microsoft Word application form instead.

If you are not sure which Microsoft Word form to use, please refer to the filter questions in section A of the CUREC 1A application form.

If you can fully apply no more than one approved procedure (for example if you are working with children or schools), you can apply for ethics review using the CUREC 1A form instead of the CUREC 2 form. 

Remember that you must complete the core module of the University’s research ethics and integrity training before starting your research. 

It helps to explain your project methods and potential ethical issues clearly and simply in your application. The reviewers may not be experts in your discipline. 

It is much better to use your application to show that you have identified and addressed the ethical issues associated with your research than to try to downplay them. Showing that you have a good grasp of the ethical issues will give the reviewers confidence in your ability to address them throughout the course of your research. 

All CUREC documents are subject to ongoing review. Please always refer to this page (rather than locally stored versions) for the current versions of application forms.

From Thursday 10th October 2024 all ethics applications must be submitted via Worktribe. Microsoft Word application forms submitted after midnight on Wednesday 9th October 2024 will not be accepted.

The four Microsoft Word application forms will be replaced by one online form. The form is dynamic, so the questions applicants are asked to answer will depend on answers to previous questions. 

Please refer to the guidance within the Worktribe ethics applicant user guide.

Applications will be classes as lowmedium or high risk applications.

Low risk applications (the equivalent to the previous CUREC 1B applications) are reviewed by a student's supervisor (if the applicant is a student) or by an academic colleague (if the applicant is a member of staff). Applicants should allow 30 calendar days for the review process.

Medium risk applications (the equivalent of the previous CUREC 1A applications) are reviewed by the DREC or by the SSH IDREC if the department does not have its own committee. Applicants should allow 30 calendar days for the review process.

High risk applications (the equivalent of the previous CUREC 2 applications) are reviewed by the DREC and by the SSH IDREC. Applicants should allow 60 calendar days for the review process.

Contact worktribe-ethics@it.ox.ac.uk with any questions about the new system.

 

NB: application submitted using this form will not be accepted after 9th October 2024.

Applications should be submitted from your ox.ac.uk email address to your DREC (if your department has one) or to the SSH IDREC via ethics@socsci.ox.ac.uk

Before an application can be reviewed, a signature or email endorsement is needed from the PI, the student (for student research) and the head of department or nominee. 

You will receive an email confirming receipt of your application. Please allow 30 calendar days for the review process for CUREC 1A applications. 
 

 

NB: application submitted using this form will not be accepted after 9th October 2024.

Refer to the filter questions in Section B to establish whether the CUREC 1B form is appropriate for your research.

 

The CUREC 1C form is to be completed by programme or module leaders applying for block ethics approval for a specific module.  It is not to be used to apply for ethics approval for an individual research project.

 NB: application submitted using this form will not be accepted after 9th October 2024.

 

NB: application submitted using this form will not be accepted after 9th October 2024.

Applications should be submitted from your ox.ac.uk email address to your DREC (if your department has one) or otherwise to the SSH IDREC via ethics@socsci.ox.ac.uk

If your department has its own DREC, your application will be reviewed and approved by the DREC and then by the SSH IDREC. 

If your department does not have a DREC, your application will just be reviewed by the SSH IDREC. 

Before an application can be reviewed, a signature or email endorsement is needed from the PI, the student (for student research) and the head of department or nominee. 

You will receive an email confirming receipt of your application. Please allow 60 calendar days for the review process for CUREC 2 applications. 

 

Remember to include relevant supporting documents with your application, for example:

  • recruitment invitation letters, emails and adverts
  • information sheets
  • consent forms and consent scripts
  • surveys, questionnaires and interview questions 
  • a copy of the approved risk assessment, if relevant
  • signatures or email endorsement from the head of department (or nominee), the principal investigator and the student (if applicable)

The guidance on obtaining participants’ informed consent includes templates that you are welcome to use, but remember to adapt them to your project and to your participants. 

 

Once your application has been reviewed, you will receive feedback by email, normally within 2 to 3 weeks. At this point the committee may request changes or further information. When revising the documents, it helps the reviewers if you use track changes and leave in the reviewers’ comments. 

You will receive an approval letter once your application has been approved. You must not start your study until you receive this letter.

 

Low-risk research (for example work towards an essay or thesis) undertaken by an undergraduate student whose research is eligible for review by the SSH IDREC or a DREC may qualify for expedited review. If the student can meet the criteria of, and follow, CUREC Approved Procedure 06, the student’s supervisor may conduct the ethics review. The project will then be exempt from further ethical review and approval by the DREC or by the SSH IDREC. The procedure sets out in further detail the type of low-risk undergraduate research eligible for this expedited review process.

In such cases, the undergraduate student must still complete and sign the CUREC1A application form, which must also be signed and endorsed by the student’s supervisor. This, together with any related documents (for example information for participants and consent documents), should then be emailed by the student's supervisor (from an ox.ac.uk email address) to the appropriate DREC (where one exists) or to the SSH IDREC (via ethics@socsci.ox.ac.uk) for their records. Please make it clear that the application has already been reviewed following this process otherwise it might be treated like a normal application to the DREC or IDREC. The DREC or SSH IDREC will acknowledge receipt of such applications but will not issue a formal letter of ethical approval of the project.

Please note that this procedure cannot be used by students whose research is eligible for review by the Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee (MS IDREC) or by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC).

NB: this process is being phased out during 2024. From 10th October 2024, applications will need to be submitted within Worktribe Ethics instead of following this process.

There are two options:

1. For a small number of students: the students submit individual applications within Worktribe Ethics.

2. For taught student modules where there are larger numbers of students conducting similar, low risk projects, the Programme or Module leader may submit an application to the DREC or SSH IDREC for approval of a devolved process for the review of individual student projects, for a maximum of three years (the equivalent of the CUREC 1C form).

Useful information

 

Our frequently asked questions include:

  • Do I need approval?
  • Completing the application
  • Data management

 

The Central University Research Ethics Committee (CUREC) best practice guidance documents cover a range of topics.

If one of CUREC’s Approved Procedures can be applied, the research can be considered medium risk rather than high risk

Information on the documents that will need to be prepared and submitted alongside the application form is provided in the Application forms and process section. There are also instructions within the application forms. 

 

Research integrity training is compulsory for all University research staff and research students.  Online research integrity training is available to all University staff and students via the course booking system CoSy.  Further information is available on the research integrity and ethics training page

An introductory course on research ethics at Oxford (Social Sciences and Humanities) takes place each term.

There is also a video-recording of a previous 'Introduction to research ethics (Social Sciences and Humanities)' training session. You will need to sign in with your University SSO.  You will not receive a certificate of completion after watching this, but it will be a useful general introduction to research ethics at Oxford.

 

You should allow 30 calendar days for the review of low and medium risk applications and 60 calendar days for the review of high risk applications. 

 

If you have any questions about the application process or about addressing the ethical issues in your research do contact your DREC administrator or the SSH IDREC Secretariat for advice.

Contact worktribe-ethics@it.ox.ac.uk with any questions about Worktribe Ethics.

Further information about the SSH IDREC, including the Committee's Standing Orders and a list of Committee members.

After approval

Expand All

 

As your project progresses, there may be reasons to make changes (for example to the duration, or to recruitment methods). If these changes alter the ethical frame of the project and thus require re-review, the proposed amendment will need to be reviewed by the ethics committee that reviewed the original application.

Amendments are to be submitted using the same system as the original ethics application.

If the original ethics application was made using a Microsoft Word application form, the amendment needs to be submitted using the SSH IDREC amendment form. Submit the amendment to ethics@socsci.ox.ac.uk or to your DREC for review. If the original application had been reviewed by both a DREC and the SSH IDREC (for example a CUREC 2) then the amendment must be submitted to the IDREC for review.

If the original application was submitted through Worktribe, the amendment will also need to be submitted through Worktribe. Refer to the Worktribe user guide for instructions.

The amended application form and any amended or new supporting documents will also need to be submitted. Accept any previous tracked changes and use track changes or a different colour to indicate the amendments within the documents.

 

The committee may ask to review your project, or for you to complete an annual progress report as part of routine monitoring exercises:

Please always make sure you have the most up-to-date study procedures, supporting information and approval letters to hand for ease of review.  

In extremely rare cases it may not be possible to approve an ethics application. An appeals procedure is available for appealing a decision to withhold, suspend or withdraw approval of research. Applicants are welcome to contact the DREC (if applicable) or IDREC Secretariat for informal advice ahead of submitting an appeal.

 

In the event that a complaint is made about research approved by this research ethics committee, it should be referred to RGEA.complaints@admin.ox.ac.uk 

Where it becomes apparent that there has been a serious breach of the terms of the ethical approval, this will be communicated to the research ethics committee.

Any complaints about the committee itself should be made to CUREC: curec@admin.ox.ac.uk